I9 9900k geekbench windows#

Here is all information from GeekBench 5 benchmark. Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. Even so, Intel says it might take until late 2021 for Intel to catch up with AMD. You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by seeing the comprehensive benchmark Intel Core i9-9900K GeekBench 5 score single and multi core and decide how powerful is this processor, is it a good CPU or a bad one to buy. This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above.

I9 9900k geekbench windows#

The biggest bit of information that we're still missing is what they will cost - though given that AMD's Ryzen 3000 CPUs are brutally competitive and Intel does need to catch up, we somehow doubt the price hikes will be all too steep. Processor performance Intel Core i9-9900K in the Geekbench 5 benchmarking platform and in this case with the Windows operating system. Of course, we won't know for sure until the chips come out and we get them in our labs for review. The i9-10900K was benchmarked in the ASRock Z490M Pro4 together with 32GB of DDR4 memory. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 5950X is 18 better than Core i9-9900K. This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. Nevertheless, the spotted results suggest Intel has been able to tame the power consumption somewhat, thus enabling higher sustained boost frequencies and the higher performance that comes with that.Īlso note that it's highly unlikely that the two chips were tested on the same motherboard with identical cooling, which can also account for differences. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-9900KS and Intel Core i9-9900K before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming. As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors.

It's been known for a while that Intel has been having problems with the power consumption of its new Comet Lake Desktop chips, as these are still to be on the 14nm fabrication process, and packing this many cores into a CPU at that node size makes for some very power-hungry silicon.